Identifying Trends and Changes in the Social Media Landscape

No Gravatar

Social media tools are a great way to get to know your audience better and for less expense, than you ever have before. Yet, social media tools seem to change overnight. As Heidi Klum says on Project Runway, “One minute you’re in, the next, you’re out.”

For social media marketers, communicators, and researchers, this means not only keeping your finger on the pulse of public conversation but also on how that conversation is getting around. New technology impacts the quality, quantity, and use of information as it moves across a networked society. With apologies to Marshall McLuhan, both the medium and the message will impact your relationship with your audience.

Zeitgeist is a German term that means, literally, the spirit of the times. It captures what’s on our mind, our mood, and the energy level across society. As our world becomes more interconnected, we have the ability to watch the zeitgeist of the country online through different lenses, from sophisticated ones like search engine data to more intimate ones like trolling around on Facebook walls.

The zeitgeist is the context or social backdrop that has significant influence on not just what information flows across the networks, but how we understand the information and act on it. Keeping abreast of these trends is part of developing an more accurate understanding of the people you want to reach. Web marketing pundits argue that building buyer personas is the best way to create a great marketing program. A persona—or archetype, ideal model, or prototype, depending upon your industry—is a defined group that represents your primary customer. A good persona goes beyond the assessment of Influencers or Enthusiasts. Think ‘NASCAR Dads’ or ‘Stay-at-home Moms.’

Developing accurate archetypes addresses several problems. It provides:

  • a reality check about whether or not you really know your customer
  • an evaluation of whether the product or service will do what the customer wants and or needs
  • focuses your marketing efforts more clearly on how to reach your audience

But where do we start looking for the data we need to understand the social context necessary to build up useful customer models?

Several research methods are available to help. These include surveys, interviews, contextual inquiries, web analytics and ethnographic research. The good news is that developing personas in social media relies heavily, and relatively inexpensively, on ethnography and web analytics.

For up close and personal, you can’t beat ethnographic research. It examines the patterns of behavior, artifacts, and social patterns within a society or segment of society. It conjures up visions of Margaret Mead heading out to remote villages to understand indigenous tribes. Previously out of reach of the budgets of most small companies, this kind of research is now available through social participation from anywhere you can connect via computer or mobile device. You can find and join conversations all across the web to find out where your audience is most likely to be. Then you can lurk about the edges and see what’s on their minds. Sites like Facebook and MySpace are contained or bounded communities with observable behaviors, patterns and artifacts in the form of photos, notes, recommendations, and widgets. Not much different from those indigenous tribes. The same is true of social networks like Ning and LinkedIn. This open access allows for immersion—important because you must do a lot of listening before you talk. Immersion is the best way to learn a foreign language because you experience the culture. It’s the same thing in social media. Immersion into social media networks will give you insight into a richer palette than normal psychographics. You can see the psychological manifestations of social networking, such as the need for affiliation, identity development, self-presentation, self-appraisal, belief structures, and interaction and communication styles reflective of individual differences and cognitive and emotional development. These things are fundamental drivers of our decisions and actions.

On the other hand, sometimes you want to get a view from 30,000 feet to see where the population is clumping. For that, try tools like Google Zeitgeist. Google, as the dominant search engine in brand recognition, if not every other way, has created a massive database of search activities. They are not alone in monitoring this data, but the nature of search engines means that each search company indexes information by their own algorithms and logic that can produce vastly different results. John Battelle in The Search: How Google and Its Rivals Rewrote the Rules of Business and Transformed Our Culture says search behavior creates a database of intentions because searching is a manifestation of intended behavior. Bill Tancer’s Click: What Millions of People Are Doing Online and Why it Matters describes how the dynamics of emotional shifts or responses to society-wide events filter through the systems and impact consumer trends and behavior. Watching meaningful patterns emerge is a social psychologist’s dream come true. Articulating those patterns into strategy is a marketer’s.

Combining macro and micro approaches allows you to bracket your target audience with local influences and conversations in the context of broader social activity. This helps you formulate an understanding of an audience segmentation that encapsulate sets of characteristics, needs, and behaviors. Once you have a clear picture of your audience and market, you will be able to assess how the specific social media tools will connect you with your target audience in meaningful ways and fit with your goals.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Hang in There Jack: A Case Study in Cross-Platform Digital Storytelling

No Gravatar

Why would someone use television ads, billboards, and print to drive people to online and social media sites?

1) For the right audience, social media has lots of advantages, speed of dissemination, trust, interaction, expectations, collaboration, and emotional investment in user-generated content, engagement, curiosity, or
2) you are trying to look very hip and don’t care if it motivates action.

The ‘Hang in there Jack’ campaign is one very effective example. It successfully crosses from traditional media to the Internet (Hangintherejack.com) and social media applications such as Facebook, Flickr, and Twitter and invites a relationship with the user by encouraging user-generated content via different avenues: comments, videos, text messages, and snail mail get well cards. By doing this, it shifts the focus of the advertising message from the company (Jack in the Box, Inc.) to the user. Jack is now the vehicle for dissemination not the primary message. The hand-off from individual to individual via these various applications gives Jack’s storyline a sustainability and a patina of authenticity that could not happen with a direct ad campaign.


Demographically, this campaign will appeal most to users who are young or early adopters (Pew Internet Report : Use of Twitter is about 20% until you hit 34, then it starts dropping off steadily to 10% of 35 to 44 year olds and 5% of 45 to 54 year olds using Twitter. It’s down to 2% by the time you hit 65.)   Over half the Internet population is under 44; although there is growth across all age groups. The interesting thing about these stats combined with the emphasis on the ‘Get Well Jack’ videos is that downloading videos is growing in popularity across all ages. And I’m quite confident that Jack made these marketing decisions knowing the demographics of his customer base.

Jack has created (and I hate to use this word) buzz by successfully integrating multiple media applications and platforms.  There really is something for everyone in the mix. In the new media environment, integration is key and the envelope will  continue to be pushed.  I wonder, will we see a mobile Jack app beyond texting? Is there an integration between the physical sites to the web/social network sites, like streaming video where people in a Jack in the Box can send their message to Jack, or coupons sent to people who submit videos to the site?   If there isn’t already, there should be.

Personally, I’d like to see Jack in the Box extend this campaign and direct their customers to send messages to real people in real hospitals who could use some emotional support and cheering up. That would create tangible social capital for their brand by converting playful enthusiasm into empathy and awareness of others.

Is there potential downside? Probably not. The questions I would have asked during planning are: Will the story play out in a way that meets the expectations of the fans? Will the narrative stay fresh or will people will get bored and move on? Can we continue to drive it into new applications and create new linkages? Is the story line a little morbid (especially in this economy)? Will it alienate people who don’t want to watch someone in a hospital bed? Or those digital immigrants who them feel out of it and irrelevant with new technology?

The sales numbers and interest level will be interesting to track. I will resist any urge to mention boxes in relation to thinking, but Jack has created a good case study here.

Photos from http://www.hangintherejack.com
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

New Communication Rules Bring New Communication Careers

No Gravatar

Newsweek‘s Technology Section has an article called “Twitter, Unmasked: Who is really writing all those Tweets? Professional microbloggers.” This article  underscores the importance of looking at new media with an open-mind. Too many people I know, when faced with media that is not indigenous to their technological coming of age, spend way too long explaining why something isn’t important (or worse, is dangerous) without trying to their outside their initial reaction and looking to see how the technology is being used and experienced.   As a media psychologist, I’m kind of fixated on that experience thing.

Piles of psychological research shows that humans are social animals that need to be connected to others, and, among other things, that interpersonal connections are essential for mental and physical health, and that different people have different connection styles.  A lot of people fretted and tried to prove that Web 2.0 technology was going to isolate people and deprive them of their social skill repertoire.  With interpersonal connections such a big theme in human lives, why are so many people surprised to find out that social networks, like Twitter and Facebook, become real connections, even 140 characters at a time? These  social connections have enormous impact on how information is passed along and how trust and credibility is established, but by entirely new routes and rules.  The Newsweek article says:

While some microbloggers are who they say they are, plenty of celeb feeds (Ryan Seacrest’s, U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s, Barack Obama’s) are actually being penned by folks like the one Spears sought out. And the skills she required—experience launching online communities, addiction to MySpace and Facebook, graphic design experience, and a love for “creating relationships”—are the same ones companies need as they venture onto Twitter. That explains why, on the corporate side, business are relying on in-house publicists, marketing managers and new professional blogging firms like Twit4hire to helm their accounts.

The article excerpt show how how professions will emerge in response to technological innovation. (Twit4Hire may be the best name of all time.) Parents need to embrace the idea that when kids say they don’t know what they want to be when they grow up, they mean it; they don’t even know what the choices will be.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Copyright © · Media Psychology Research Center · on WordPress ·