<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media is more than Sound Bytes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mprcenter.org/blog/2008/07/22/social-media-is-more-than-sound-bytes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mprcenter.org/blog/2008/07/22/social-media-is-more-than-sound-bytes/</link>
	<description>The psychology of technology and emerging media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:12:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Cabiria</title>
		<link>http://mprcenter.org/blog/2008/07/22/social-media-is-more-than-sound-bytes/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Cabiria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mprcenter.org/blog/?p=75#comment-177</guid>
		<description>Avrum, I would respectfully disagree to some extent.  Yes, there are many social networking tools, but no, they are not all doing the same thing. I admit that there is a certain level of duplication in some areas, but that is common in any new trend as the marketplace shakes things out.   Still, the mass of users indicates some level of utility for the &quot;average Joe&quot; and Josephine.

I do respect your experiential observations but they seem a little limited in scope to make a generalization.  In research, there is indication of a broader range of tools being used, and those tools are growing in user numbers, as well as evolving as next-gen social tools emerge.  Trends seem to point to change in use and types of social media as companies merge, products evolve, and users demand alternatives.

It will be interesting to see how this all plays out in the near future.  History does indicate that very few brand leaders in the early stages of service introduction make it to the maturity stage intact.

Thanks for the feedback.  I&#039;ll think more about your comments.  Much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avrum, I would respectfully disagree to some extent.  Yes, there are many social networking tools, but no, they are not all doing the same thing. I admit that there is a certain level of duplication in some areas, but that is common in any new trend as the marketplace shakes things out.   Still, the mass of users indicates some level of utility for the &#8220;average Joe&#8221; and Josephine.</p>
<p>I do respect your experiential observations but they seem a little limited in scope to make a generalization.  In research, there is indication of a broader range of tools being used, and those tools are growing in user numbers, as well as evolving as next-gen social tools emerge.  Trends seem to point to change in use and types of social media as companies merge, products evolve, and users demand alternatives.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see how this all plays out in the near future.  History does indicate that very few brand leaders in the early stages of service introduction make it to the maturity stage intact.</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback.  I&#8217;ll think more about your comments.  Much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avrum Nadigel</title>
		<link>http://mprcenter.org/blog/2008/07/22/social-media-is-more-than-sound-bytes/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Avrum Nadigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mprcenter.org/blog/?p=75#comment-175</guid>
		<description>At the end of the day, there&#039;s too many tools, all  doing the same thing. And the information is being said too many times for any of it to be helpful/useful to your avg Joe. 

To date, none of my friends (most work in the mental health field, medical and marketing fields) nor the adolescents I work with use anything other than Facebook, Youtube and Google. And I don&#039;t see that changing anytime soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the end of the day, there&#8217;s too many tools, all  doing the same thing. And the information is being said too many times for any of it to be helpful/useful to your avg Joe. </p>
<p>To date, none of my friends (most work in the mental health field, medical and marketing fields) nor the adolescents I work with use anything other than Facebook, Youtube and Google. And I don&#8217;t see that changing anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Rutledge</title>
		<link>http://mprcenter.org/blog/2008/07/22/social-media-is-more-than-sound-bytes/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Rutledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mprcenter.org/blog/?p=75#comment-171</guid>
		<description>Jon - It is exciting and challenging (and time-consuming) to keep up with all the emerging developments for connection in social media.  Just when I think I&#039;m almost caught up, you mention one I don&#039;t know.  I&#039;m not sure if I should thank you or not :-)  Would be interesting to see what is the dominant driver for the choice of connection-- personal differences  or if type of content/message.  Great entry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon &#8211; It is exciting and challenging (and time-consuming) to keep up with all the emerging developments for connection in social media.  Just when I think I&#8217;m almost caught up, you mention one I don&#8217;t know.  I&#8217;m not sure if I should thank you or not <img src='http://mprcenter.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   Would be interesting to see what is the dominant driver for the choice of connection&#8211; personal differences  or if type of content/message.  Great entry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

